GRE Argument写作常用论证句式

GRE Argument写作中论证语言的训练非常重要，最重要的还是内在的逻辑性，下面小编为大家整理了以下常用的论证句式，希望能够帮助大家更好的备考GRE考试。由查字典出国留学网的GRE频道小编为同学们介绍的《GRE Argument写作常用论证句式》，希望对大家的GRE写作有所启发。

The mere fact thatticket sales in recent years for screenplay-based movies have exceeded those for book-based movies is insufficient evidence to conclude that writing screenplays now provides greater financial opportunity for writers.

The fact thatthe nearby city has a weakening economy does not prove that (does not support the claim that/does not ensure that/lends no strong support to the conclusion that) the city will not contribute significantly to tax revenues.

The fact thatthe student performance improved after the application of interactive computer instruction does not necessarily imply that the new teaching method is responsible for the achievements.

The argument fails to rule out the possibility that a writer engage in both types of writing as well as other types.

The argument simply equatessuccess with movie ticket sales, which is unwarranted.

The author assumes thatphysical capabilities are the only attributes necessary to operate a motor vehicle.

The author provides no evidence that the realism of photography is the reason for its predominance.

This assumption presents a false dilemma, since the two media are not necessarily mutually exclusive alternatives.

Common sense tells us that a photographer can succeed by working in both media.

While this may be true in some cases, but it is equally possible thatonly companies with products that are already best-sellers can afford the higher ad rates that popular shows demand.

Lacking some specific information abouthow these other employees responded, it is impossible to assess the reliability of the survey’s results or to make an informed recommendation.

The editorial fails to take into account possible differences betweenEast and West Cambria that are relevant to how drivers react to speed-limit changes.

While it is true that many voters change their minds several times before voting, and that some remain undecided until entering the voting booth, this is not true of anyone.

Unless the author can demonstrate thatthe city will incur expenses that are not covered by the increased revenues from these projects, the author’s concern about these issues is unfounded.

The author fails to consider and rule out other factors that might account for proportional decreases in spending on food.

The author ignores/fails to take into account (consider/explain) other likely benefits of agricultural technology that affect food pieces only indirectly or not at all.

Unlessthe original cast and production team are involved in making the sequel, there is a good chance it will not be financially successful.

The author is presenting a false dilemma by imposing an either-or choice between two courses of action that need not be mutually exclusive.

Comprehensive analysis is necessary to identify the actual cause(s) ofthe company’s lowered profitability.

Therefore, any decision aimed at addressing the problem of falling circulation must be based on more thorough investigation to gather sufficient data in order to narrow down and locate the actual causes(s) of the problem.

From the survey quoted in the argument, however, we find no sign of such procedures for random sampling, and have good reason to doubt if the sample is representative enough to reflect the general attitudes of all workers as a whole.

When samples are used to make general claims about a particular group, the samples should be close enough in time to the generalization they are used to support, so that historical changes will not invalidate the generalization.

The problem is that the two situations are not similar enough to justify the analogical deduction.

The argument rests on the gratuitous/unreasonable assumption thatApia’s work and quality are more superior to Macadam.

The arguer fails to establish a causal relationship betweenthe homework frequency and the performance of students.